Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+No\s+Contest\s+\-\-\s+CW\s+vs\.\s+txt\s+msg\'g\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1)
Author: W1HIJCW@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:51:48 EDT
For those of you who didn't see Jay Leno's Tonight show last night (Friday), there was NO contest in the contest for speed and accuracy in transmitting a message via morse versus using text messaging
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00171.html (8,652 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 02:03:02 -0400
Hi Bill, Need to get that picture tube replaced if you don't enjoy interviews with the Desperate Housewifes. <hi> Well, the interviews aren't really that important..................... The CW really
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00189.html (10,082 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:34:57 +0600
Absolutely superb. What a performance. Hats off to Chip and Ken. You need to see the face of a young guy from SMS team when they got beaten so quickly :) 73, Igor UA9CDC -- Original Message -- From:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00191.html (9,513 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:31:33 -0000
The fastest CW on the planet will happen next month in Macedonia. I'm going. Any other stateside guys want to join me? As of this moment, I'm a one man team. It's not too late to sign up (entry appli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00195.html (11,685 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 10:01:41 -0500 (CDT)
Excellent "jorb", guys! The text messaging guy said he was able to send 160 characters in 57 seconds. By my calculations, that's roughly 33 wpm. A lot of us can do far better than that! He's going to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00196.html (8,821 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:11:27 -0400
Actually, he said he could "type" 160 characters in 57 seconds. The problems with SMS are the difficulty of entering a text message using 12 keys (multiple keystrokes for each character) and the del
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00199.html (8,564 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 16:50:28 -0000
Zack, 160 cpm, assuming letters, is 39 WPM. 73, Barry, W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00203.html (9,855 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu