Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NOT\s+IN\s+LOG\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Not In Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 12 14:02:36 1999
ACCURACY is expected, it is not a reward. Otherwise there would be extra points by the log checkers for getting it right. The problem I see with the current process is that it is not complete, has to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00103.html (8,022 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Not In Log (score: 1)
Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 12 14:02:36 1999
ACCURACY is expected, it is not a reward. Otherwise there would be extra points by the log checkers for getting it right. The problem I see with the current process is that it is not complete, has to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00364.html (8,033 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: "VE3DZ" <va3uz@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:15:50 -0400
Last year in the CQ WW CW I had a QSO on 80 m with a good friend of mine - UT3**. Later, I found that this QSO was marked as -N in my UBN (see below) so I lost points and was penalized: 109 -N UT3**(
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00532.html (7,604 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:01:27 EDT
I sent him an e-mail and he confessed that he had a computer crash shortly after our QSO and he lost our QSO plus few more U.S. contacts on 80 in his LOG. Fair to me? Not really. But S!*T happens som
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00615.html (6,545 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:29:54 +0200
So someone makes 5000 Q&acute;s, during that time he/she has a computer glitch and 25 goes bye bye, he/she should then due to that just submit a check log. Well I&acute;m very very sorry but that sce
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00616.html (7,374 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:16:40 -0400
Losing a QSO that way is OK. Not a big deal, just a bad luck - it happens all the time. But being penalized for the bad luck (i.e. losing ** additional ** 3 QSOs) is simply - insane. 73, Sinisa YT1NT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00620.html (7,307 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 31 Jul 2006 10:23:37 -0500
Is it fair to penalize the 25 guys whose QSOs vanished? (and in some contests, to penalize them an additional 3 QSOs?) Possibly even a multiplier or two? It could be the difference between a plaque a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00621.html (8,322 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:47:00 -0700
Perhaps someone involved in log checking could tell us how they would handle a soapbox comment saying that, "I lost 25 Qs between the times of xxxx and xxyy." I've included such comments when I've do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00001.html (7,248 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:32:49 -0400
While I'm sure practices vary, we have heard in this forum from authoritative participants in the log-checking process of major contests, indicating that human judgment is generally applied to every
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00002.html (9,099 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: "Mirko S57AD" <miroslav.sibilja@amis.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:37:50 +0200
In such a case we (EUHFC & SCC RTTY) approve such a contacts (missing in someone's log) as valid, as long as there exists notification in corrsspodent's log. Mirko, S57AD Perhaps someone involved in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00005.html (9,060 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:22:05 -0400
I think that Pete's statement about human review is correct as applied to CQ Magazine contests. I think it is not accurate as to ARRL sponsored contests. As I understand it from those involved, the A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00009.html (7,573 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] NOT IN LOG (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:55:07 -0800
In 2008 as 6W1RY in CQWW Phone I was penalized and lost a multiple = because I was not in the log of the infamous D4C operation that was = later disqualified. They got disqualified, but I was penaliz
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00206.html (8,792 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu