- 1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
- Author: "Bryon PAUL Veal n0ah" <bryonveal@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:35:15 -0700
- Walking on egg shells here but.......I think the ARRL should have kept the "volunteer band plan allocations" on their most recent US Amateur Radio Bands published and passed out dated 3/26/2007. To a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00063.html (8,174 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
- Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:07:11 -0800 (PST)
- http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Hambands_color.pdf May 6, 2008. Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group http://k4tcg.org/ http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en Tennessee QSO Party http://www.t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00066.html (9,529 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
- Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:38:59 -0600
- While the RTTY weenies running high power make one contact per minute this Saturday I will be nosing around "their" frequencies, making two contacts per minute in the NAQP CW with my receiver passban
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00068.html (7,501 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP vs ARRL RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
- Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:19:21 -0700
- I'll see you there Jim, with my passband narrowed up, and a short exchange... the interference won't be able to keep up. We can be done and move to a new freq by the time they get to tx. --... ...--
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00074.html (8,545 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu