- 1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro@k4ro.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:59:32 -0600
- The NCJ North American QSO Party CW contest is scheduled for this coming weekend. Unfortunately, the rules for the NAQP and Sprint contests were accidentally omitted from the January/February 2013 is
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00035.html (8,626 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:46:00 -0500
- Yet still DC is not a multiplier... We do not live in Maryland. 73, Paul, N8HM Washington, DC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00037.html (9,659 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:05:24 -0700
- And DC is not a State. Mike W0MU We do not live in Maryland. 73, Paul, N8HM Washington, DC On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:59 AM, K4RO Kirk Pickering <k4ro@k4ro.net> wrote: The NCJ North American QSO Party
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00038.html (9,907 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 12:14:23 -0800
- Maybe DC should just send DX since it is not a mult. Heh, heh.... 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00039.html (7,341 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:02:02 -0500
- I thought the District was a state of mind, or insanity, or gridlock, or something along those lines. If I lived in the District, I'd be very tempted to use the name "DC" during the tests. -- *Michae
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00040.html (8,615 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:14:54 -0500
- DC is the only top-level political subdivision in the United States or Canada that is not a multiplier. All the Canadian territories are multipliers (I don't see anybody complaining that the Northwes
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00041.html (12,813 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:38:19 -0500
- Mike W0MU So why did I get multiplier credit for KP4 in the last NAQP? 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00042.html (8,186 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:16:43 -0700
- I guess with this thinking every Indian Reservation should be a multiplier too? National Parks? If I can drive up toe Rocky Mountain National Park and be a mult I am in. Mike W0MU On 1/8/2013 1:14 PM
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00043.html (12,065 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: Bernie McClenny <bernie@dailydx.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 05:05:23 -0500
- Rich Per the rules KP4 is a multiplier as it is a DXCC country in NA. Bernie McClenny, W3UR The Daily DX www.dailydx.com So why did I get multiplier credit for KP4 in the last NAQP? 73 Rich NN3W ____
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00044.html (8,981 bytes)
- 10. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:57:04 -0500
- Not really. With respect to Native American reservations, Public Law 280 grants the states authority to enforce laws within reservations that are located within their respective states. 18 U.S.C. § 1
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00047.html (10,215 bytes)
- 11. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules for 2013 (score: 1)
- Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:33:16 -0700
- Can you please explain to me ... in objective terms ... why it matters overall (i.e., to the contest community in general) whether DC is a multiplier or not? This is a contest, with everyone competin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00048.html (10,062 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu