Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+$A$\s+class\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NAQP\s+$A$\s+class\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP (A) class (score: 1): Author: ko7ss@yahoo.com; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:02:29 -0800 (PST); IMHO, there really should be an (A) class in NAQP! Skimmers are being used, many times yesterday I had groups of 3-5 stations call in absolutely zero-beat. What's the point in making (A) stations ent; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00046.html (6,777 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP (A) class (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:18:13 -0500; I agree with your advocacy of an assisted class, Bill, but it's not just Skimmers. Any spottingproduces the same phenomenon. I suspect that many people get on during NAQP and use spots, not because t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00048.html (8,621 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]