- 1. [CQ-Contest] NAQP-a different view (score: 1)
- Author: W1HIJ@contesting.com (W1HIJ--Bill)
- Date: Tue Jan 20 06:35:27 1998
- Hi Gang, Well, since the inevitable thread of rule changes for NAQP is now in full swing, here's another opinion for the pot.... The advent of single op/two (or more) radio stations and operators has
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00467.html (7,869 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] NAQP-a different view (score: 1)
- Author: k4ro@music-city.tdec.state.tn.us (k4ro@music-city.tdec.state.tn.us)
- Date: Tue Jan 20 18:34:23 1998
- Then how come N4ZZ has won this contest with one radio, even against the best SO2R operators out there? How does he consistently outscore 90% of the two radio guys, if the playing field is so out of
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00477.html (7,484 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] NAQP-a different view (score: 1)
- Author: w5xd@alum.mit.edu (Wayne E. Wright)
- Date: Wed Jan 21 02:47:22 1998
- If "two radios" is a separate class, then what class am I if I run one transceiver and one receiver (remember those boxes that came with with no mic or key jack?). Clearly I'm in one radio category?
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00481.html (7,612 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] NAQP-a different view (score: 1)
- Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough)
- Date: Tue Jan 20 21:57:14 1998
- Because he is a mutant. :-) --Trey, N5KO -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00486.html (7,046 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] NAQP-a different view (score: 1)
- Author: rocker@datasync.com (Ray Rocker)
- Date: Wed Jan 21 02:30:36 1998
- That's about as convincing an argument as I've heard against the one-radio-two-radio split. Heck, that even kills my idea to have another column in the results with a 1 or a 2 in it. 'Tis no matter,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00487.html (8,574 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu