Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Multiple\s+Zero\s+Beat\s+Callers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Multiple\s+Zero\s+Beat\s+Callers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Multiple Zero Beat Callers (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 11:41:30 -0700; If I can't get at least a partial call, I try to wait them out, hoping that at least one of them will be smart enough to dump his call in again. :) JAs, bless them, are so well behaved that it never; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00051.html (10,398 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiple Zero Beat Callers (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:30:01 +0700; I often get many (a dozen?) zero beat callers on ssb, due to my being mild DX and not wanting to take up band space with a split. I found the technique with a IC-706 on VU4 and now use it often with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00054.html (11,164 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]