Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Missing\s+Low\s+power\s+in\s+ARRL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Missing\s+Low\s+power\s+in\s+ARRL\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Missing Low power in ARRL (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:46:29 -0400; A couple of the gang pointed out that the ARRL consider all single band entries as High Power or actually no power advantage. I did see a few of the entries did have C or B indicating High or low pow; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00196.html (7,286 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Missing Low power in ARRL (score: 1): Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:02:09 -0700; Dave, You are quite correct in that past years power was occasionally mentioned in the writeups for single-band results. This year, however, the fraction of single-band logs for which a power was in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00203.html (8,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]