Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Malicious\s+Interference\s+during\s+SS\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:48:25 -0500
A DRM SW broadcast starting on the half-hour? 73, Mike K1MK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00427.html (12,489 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "Leonard J. Umina" <len@brasspounders.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:37:04 -0800
A lot of the interference I encounter is intentional, but its the contest operators who do it. I've known certain ops who use rigs with bad CW keying intentionally because it "helps" them hold a perc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00431.html (15,593 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:51:20 -0800
Skimmer doesn't do phone. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00434.html (9,646 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:14:28 -0800
Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00120.html (7,522 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:23:51 EST
Absolutely. Most of the fun, is the chase! 73- Chuck KI9A In a message dated 12/4/2008 8:18:49 P.M. Central Standard Time, kzerohb@gmail.com writes: Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes. 73, de Hans
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00132.html (8,117 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:22:06 -0800
I agree. That's the same as saying any section with more than, say, 25 operators in it should be considered worked by default. If everyone can get a sweep, the contest becomes meaningless. 73 -- Paul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00134.html (8,485 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:09:26 -0500
"if the section is not populated enough to field at least 5 stations during a contest then it should not be necessary to work it." I'm sure the person who posted this is getting the message that the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00137.html (7,991 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu