Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+MP\s+vs\s+830\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+MP\s+vs\s+830\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] MP vs 830 (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Mon May 28 13:30:29 2001; We used a TS830 this weekend to run, and I thought I would pass one a few observations: - I like the receiver better. Can't explain it. I just do. - The noise blanker in the 830 works. The MP's doesn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00286.html (7,427 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] MP vs 830 (score: 1): Author: v31jp@logical123.net (Joe Pontek); Date: Tue May 29 04:32:08 2001; I don't know if the TS-830 VFO tuning is like the TS-430, but there was a mod to slow it's tuning rate. I used it on my TS-430 and worked great. This maybe worth looking into. I wonder if the TS-930; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00295.html (7,245 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] MP vs 830 (score: 1): Author: bjk@ihug.co.nz (Barry Kirkwood); Date: Tue May 29 23:21:27 2001; TS 930: tuning rate reduced from 10kHz to 5kHZ per rev by cutting D-13 in the digital unit. 73 end Barry Kirkwood PhD ZL1DD Signal Hill Homestay 66 Cory Road Palm Beach Waiheke Island 1240 NEW ZEALAN; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00297.html (8,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]