Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Low\s+band\s+antenna\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Low\s+band\s+antenna\s+question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1): Author: "John R. Klim II" <john.klim@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:01:54 -0400; Hi, Is anyone using a GAP VOYAGER DX antenna? If yes what us your opinion of the antenna on 80m and 160m? Would you recommend this antenna? If no, what would you recommend for 160m in a limited area; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00111.html (6,746 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1): Author: Joseph Feustle <jfeustle@feustle.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:18:43 -0400; Hi, John. I had one for several years. It was okay on 40, passable at times on 80, and lousy on 160, even though it showed really neat SWR. I have essentially the same space restrictions that you do.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00119.html (8,496 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:44:25 -0600; I've had mighty good luck with a 40 foot high NORD with an OMEGA match, and 32 radials, some were actually a 1/4 wave long.I'm currently building a new vertical that, should.... we all hope the best; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00120.html (8,387 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1): Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:31:18 -0400; I would agree with Joe ..... I had a Voyager up for about 5 years in a 1 acre field. Real good on 40 Pretty decent on 80 Poor on 160 - both RX and TX I've had much better luck on 160 with a loaded 1/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00122.html (9,643 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:38:37 -0000; GAP Voyager is probably the worst antenna ever made. Several years ago a friend of mine, who lived 2 miles from me, put one up. He wanted to make A/B checks with me because I had full-sized antennas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00137.html (8,788 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:53:58 -0500 (CDT); I considered getting a Gap antenna (either a Voayger or a Titan) a while back but read some reviews on-line and didn't like what I saw. Evidently they have mechanical problems as well and in some cas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00138.html (10,108 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:07:46 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- If he is transmitting ok but not receiving, that does not sound like an antenna problem to me. He probably has a local noise issue. Bill W6WRT __________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00147.html (7,914 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]