- 1. [CQ-Contest] LotW - Personal Identification (score: 1)
- Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:38:15 -0500
- It's been interesting reading some of the criticisms about ARRL's LotW identification requirements. The resistance shown is reminiscent of what I heard a lot of before I retired. I worked at Johnson
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00245.html (9,741 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Personal Identification (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
- Hi Dale, Very interesting info! Let's hope that someone at ARRL is listening. I feel sure at some point the procedures will be modified. For the US hams the only hard part of all the LOTW is having t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00272.html (10,781 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Personal Identification (score: 1)
- Author: Nick Fedoseev <nf@tav.kiev.ua>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:57:46 +0300
- Hello Dale, I was in correspondence with David Patton, NN1N about a month ago. And finally I listed the same problems with the Personal Idetinfication (I worked as a security expert for one US firm,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00283.html (9,818 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu