Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LotW\s+\-\s+Personal\s+Identification\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LotW\s+\-\s+Personal\s+Identification\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LotW - Personal Identification (score: 1): Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 22:38:15 -0500; It's been interesting reading some of the criticisms about ARRL's LotW identification requirements. The resistance shown is reminiscent of what I heard a lot of before I retired. I worked at Johnson; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00245.html (9,741 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Personal Identification (score: 1): Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT); Hi Dale, Very interesting info! Let's hope that someone at ARRL is listening. I feel sure at some point the procedures will be modified. For the US hams the only hard part of all the LOTW is having t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00272.html (10,781 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Personal Identification (score: 1): Author: Nick Fedoseev <nf@tav.kiev.ua>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:57:46 +0300; Hello Dale, I was in correspondence with David Patton, NN1N about a month ago. And finally I listed the same problems with the Personal Idetinfication (I worked as a security expert for one US firm,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00283.html (9,818 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]