Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Loss\s+of\s+Confidence\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 02:14:57 +0000
During the WAE RTTY test this past weekend I came across a small handful of stations which did not include a signal report (RST) in the report. Two of the stations were well known USA "competitors" w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00051.html (8,309 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 21:47:09 -0800
So it's OK for stations to drop stuff like their call from the SS exchange, and the report from that RTTY contest, so that at the end of the contest they've made better rate and a higher score? On SS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00053.html (8,171 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: it9blb@infcom.it
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:01:59 +0100 (CET)
"5 Exchange ... SNIP.. The exchange consists of RS/RST and a progressive serial number starting with 001... SNIP" in my opinion the "it happens all the time so we let it slide" technique is certainly
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00054.html (9,272 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 08:59:53 -0600
I agree about making a "NIL" on his contact. This makes me wonder if the contest sponsor is actually checking the logs even with that relaxed way of thinking.  Not logging him is a start, But at the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00055.html (9,202 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 14:20:34 -0600
In most contests, isn't giving your callsign part of the requirement for a QSO?  I hear many stations running who only give their call once every few QSOs.  It would seem that the QSOs when they don'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00056.html (10,001 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 17:35:09 -0500
For several contests, the rules address this. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00058.html (11,131 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 18:45:54 -0500
I think "QRZ" has a wall full of winning contest plaques in his shack, come to think of it. Ria N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00059.html (11,253 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:22:22 +0000
Whose shack would that be? 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio ________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com@contesting.com> on behalf of Ria Jairam <
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00060.html (12,650 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Sandy N7RQ via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:47:45 +0000 (UTC)
I usually contest unassisted and long ago got over my embarrassment at chirping Your Call? to elicit QRZ's actual ID.I hear ops not even running a pileup do it, which makes zero sense as it generally
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00061.html (12,419 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:47:39 -0500
So, sometimes not ID'ing after each QSO makes sense then, doesn't it? :-) 73, Yuri VE3DZ Ria N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00063.html (8,767 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 13:57:45 -0400
Hey Hans, Nice writeup in NCJ. I barely do any RTTY so I dont know who the culprits youre referring to were however I suspect most offenders whove left out the RST have just programmed their F-key me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00064.html (10,387 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 19:05:26 +0000
Mike, the two that I flagged to the WAE manager arent rookies. I checked 3830 and both of them claimed scores > 240,000. One operated SO2R. 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00065.html (11,549 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: dimitri cosson <dimitri.cosson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 21:27:34 +0100
Hans, Give the callsign directly, it'll be quicker:-D 73, Dimitri F4DSK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00066.html (13,898 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:33:21 -0400
Hans, 240k pts is barely even top 40 nowhere remotely close to a full time effort where the scores are in the low millions. You may not agree with me but the way I see it, is, you can be part of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00067.html (8,688 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:22:00 -0700
However, I've never seen a winning score from that 2x0 call from the Côte d'Ivoire - TU Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00068.html (10,005 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:41:25 -0500
Hi Barry. If someone doesn't know that "TU" isn't a valid call, then... :-) We know who's problem it is. This discussion usually starts after every major contest. All good op's know when  and how to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00069.html (11,075 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: PY2NY <py2ny.vitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 19:53:37 -0300
WAE RTTY 900.000 from PY2NY, always with 599 in the exchange. Maybe, contest rules can be changed to define, with hard discipline, the way to send report, making them obligatory/compulsory for every
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00070.html (10,733 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:59:01 -0600
I can participate in any contest using my rules, not the contest rules. I can send 59/599 or not send 59/599. And I can watch the cluster spots. And I can run 1 watt over the legal limit. But I won't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00072.html (8,250 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 13:25:52 -0700
You had fun making it difficult for the "real" participants by screwing with the exchange? If you're not submitting a log, nobody cares about your power, assistance, etc., but send the correct info t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00073.html (9,476 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence (score: 1)
Author: dimitri cosson <dimitri.cosson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 21:40:39 +0100
Hi Doug, The good idea would be to submit a check log... 73, Dimitri F4DSK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00074.html (8,937 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu