Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Log\s+question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Log question (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:48:16 -0700; Hi All In the 'work dupes-no work dupes' communiocation, one thing I've been wondering about. What happens when: 1. W7AA calls CQ 2. W7BB answers but logs call as W7AAA. 3. W7AA gets credit for conta; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00048.html (7,350 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log question (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:22:00 -0500; I think in the first exchange W7AA gets a Q. W7BB gets a "busted call" (is there a penalty?) In the second exchange I think W7AA gets a dupe (no penalty) and W7BB gets a Q. "I think, therefor I may b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00053.html (8,789 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log question (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:47:33 -0700; W7WHY asks: I can answer this for the contests I check (SS, sprints, Stew, CQ160): In the first case - the call should be identified as a busted call when doing the cross check from the W7AA log into; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00061.html (8,043 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log question (score: 1): Author: "Charles Morrison" <cfmorris@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:57:35 -0500; excepted QSO case, An excellent, plain English, question and answer that proves that all stations SHOULD work Dupes. Thanks for the answer Tree. I hope that this gets through, since there still seem; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00071.html (9,019 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Log question (score: 1): Author: Scott Stembaugh <radio.n9ljx@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:40:00 -0500; I have been haveing some software/hardware problems during the wpx rtty contest which requires me to send the exchange manually. A couple of times I misread what I needed to send for QSO number and s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00143.html (6,783 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log question (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 05:05:08 -0800; The Cabrillo file should always show what you sent/received for each QSO. Don't worry if there are some duplicate or missing numbers. The log checking software will cross check using what is in the l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00144.html (8,219 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log question (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:57:17 -0500; Yes, that is fine. Even without manually sending I have a hiccup or two and send the wrong number. So far I only had it happen once where I sent the same number to 2 back-to-back contacts when runnin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00145.html (7,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]