It APPEARS like we have a bunch of cheaters who are claiming to be unassisted, but are using packet. It also is a possibility, but not a probability, that one of the guys who worked the XY8Z repeated
I think it might be time to just do away with the packet assisted category and let everyone do whatever they want. You either have it or you dont and if you dont have it you need to find a way to get
This idea should not be tossed aside lightly. It should be hurled aside with great force! There are many contesters with a sort of "purist" mindset which goes something like this -- "every contact t
Good point Hans. peek _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
I disagree. Violently, even. True, but within the rules of the game. Most of the rules are fine as they stand. Allowing packet for everyone won't help the guys who aren't winning - it will just make
If it is just a single discrepency in the log , I don't think that in and of itself should disqualify anyone. Two or more would extend beyond a reasonable doubt however. And no,,, I don't think we ne
I don't agree with MAL on this, but I do understand his frustration. I'm with those of you who believe we should maintain separate categories for Assisted and Not. BUT, I hesitate to post a strong vi