Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LoTW\s+Usage\s+\-\s+Will\s+you\s+use\s+it\?\?\?\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis Ponsness" <wb0wao@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:37:28 +0000
Now that LoTW is up and running, I have a question for the "big guns" as well as the rest of us <grin>... Will you be uploading your contest logs to LoTW in addition to the regular contest robot? Mys
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00280.html (9,311 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 21:54:35 -0400
At 09:37 AM 9/26/2003, Dennis Ponsness WB0WAO wrote: Now that LoTW is up and running, I have a question for the "big guns" as well as the rest of us <grin>... Will you be uploading your contest logs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00283.html (10,037 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:18:54 +0000
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:37:28 +0000 "Dennis Ponsness" <wb0wao@hotmail.com> writes: Well, so far I've got about 118,000 qso's in there. Now if I can figure out how to convert some older log files to Ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00284.html (10,387 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:40:00 -0400
At 01:37 PM 9/26/03 +0000, Dennis Ponsness wrote: Now that LoTW is up and running, I have a question for the "big guns" as well as the rest of us <grin>... Will you be uploading your contest logs to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00285.html (10,104 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:39:54 +0600
a I have tried to upload my 40 000 QSO log onto LoTW but abandoned the idea as soon as I learn they require my sending them copy of my license by mail before issuing the authorization. I am prepared
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00286.html (9,776 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 04:53:24 -0000
I will, once I'm able. I have an 82K QSO file to upload. My ISP limits email to 2 meg, and the web upload is broken. Once it's fixed, it will be uploaded. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00287.html (11,157 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:29:41 -0400
Yes !!! As a "Little Gun" all I can say is I'll be using LoTW after every Contest I work!!! My next question is WHAT is the cost for applying to ARRL Awards ??? LoTW Is FREE to use and UPLOAD your Q'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00289.html (11,481 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Craig Cook <n7or@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 15:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
I am a tiny gun, but I'm using it. One OT question, though, how can I get a cert. for my OLD callsign? I followed the instructions to wait until my current callsign cert. was good, and it is. I can u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00290.html (11,604 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Sawyer" <n6nt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:14:44 -0700
I would if I could, but since I can't I won't! In the first place, the ARRL wants a mailed copy of my license before they will issue me a certificate. I can't mail that until I get back to Little Cay
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00291.html (11,071 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:03:21 -0400
When applying for a cert for an old, expired callsign, you must sign it with the cert you got for your current call. To do so, select "Signed" when prompted by TQSLcert during the cert request proced
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00295.html (13,178 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:35:15 -0400
Bruce, I would contact the league and see if they will accept a mailed CD-ROM containing your signed logs (assuming you have CD-R capability.) During the design phase, there was some talk about accep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00297.html (13,606 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:03:50 -0400
Hi, I don't speak for the ARRL, but my guess is that if you send in a signed cert request signed with your current cert, that will do the the trick. Be sure to confine the valid dates to the time tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00300.html (11,173 bytes)

13. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:44:57 -0400
Ah, that won't work unless you also send them the private key. Which I think is a very bad idea. I think it would be better to send a CD with the signed log to a friend or someone else willing to up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00302.html (10,617 bytes)

14. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:48:42 +0100
You can put the signed log/ certified log on the CD-ROM. All they need then is your public key. If I got this wrong, somebody shout at me but I always uploaded SIGNED logs. Bob Ah, that won't work un
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00304.html (11,756 bytes)

15. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:16:45 -0400
Doesn't it make sense that the ARRL should enter contest logs into LoTW? After all, they can verify QSOs by cross checking the logs of many of the participants. If they consider the post-UBN logs as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00306.html (12,422 bytes)

16. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:11:55 -0400
At 06:16 AM 9/29/2003, Ed Parish K1EP wrote: Doesn't it make sense that the ARRL should enter contest logs into LoTW? After all, they can verify QSOs by cross checking the logs of many of the partici
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00308.html (11,365 bytes)

17. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:29:52 -0400
Greetings, This would only make sense if you could upload your contest logs as signed tQSL. The LoTW database must only have authenticated tQSLs in it. Otherwise they would be meaningless. It is impo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00309.html (12,407 bytes)

18. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:37:44 -0400
Bob, You got it more than right. A signed log has the certified in it. A certified has the public key for both the signer and the CA public (which in this case is ARRL). Therefore all you need to se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00310.html (10,864 bytes)

19. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@VALLEY.NET>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:49:31 -0400
While I agree with Darryl that the most secure method is for a DX station to send a CD-R with a signed log to a QSL manager for upload to LoTW, this may not be feasible or desirable in all cases. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00315.html (14,194 bytes)

20. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:51:35 -0400
Greetings Dick and the group, This is a interesting idea. Is there any policy reason why the call sign owner and a TrustedQSL manager couldn't each have a cert for the same call sign? This would allo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00316.html (11,278 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu