Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LoTW\s+\-\s+Additional\s+Thoughts\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LoTW - Additional Thoughts.... (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis Ponsness" <wb0wao@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:09:10 +0000
I saw the fee schedule and IMHO, it isn't really out of line. I figure that 90%+ of the participants will be US stations so more than likely the major use of credits will be for WAS/VUCC rather than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00353.html (9,929 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW - Additional Thoughts.... (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:23:32 -0400
At 04:09 AM 9/30/03 +0000, Dennis Ponsness wrote: I do think that the ARRL may have to "rethink" their policy for DX stations to participate however. I have about 40 Q's out of 3300+ "confirmed" and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00373.html (10,004 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW - Additional Thoughts.... (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 01:28:43 +0000
Just for information, the Germany database is on the Buckmaster CDROM, as are most of the other countries. I have noticed one irregularity, some G stations have their call listed, followed by "no inf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00389.html (7,949 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu