Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Let\'s\s+change\s+the\s+ARRLDX\s+rules\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:05:12 -0400
It has been interesting to read the different viewpoints in this discussion. What is BIZARRE however, is the response of some people to things that I never said and points that I never made. Here is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00086.html (11,733 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "k6xx@juno.com" <k6xx@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:16:54 GMT
Indeed, it has been interesting to read the different viewpoints. Now, I'll present THE SOLUTION to this problem. It came to me on Monday morning, 21 February, while perusing the ARRL DX scores on 38
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00121.html (10,830 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:00:06 +0200
sarcasm) There is nothing wrong being on the Wrong Coast :-) Nobody mentioned NAFTA? EU would love added XE mults. 73 de Mario, S56A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00134.html (8,672 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri Onipko" <ve3dz@rac.ca>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:58:49 -0400
Don't worry Mario. Even though we are in the same MULT category with Stateside, we still have to pay customs duty and tax when buying from the U.S. 73 Yuri VE3DZ ____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00136.html (9,024 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: W0uo@cs.com
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:15:45 -0400
Bob's suggestion below is excellent and, in my opinion, is exactly what the ARRL rules call for. Amazing!! His suggestion points out that the real problem is reporting the results in ways not recogni
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00137.html (12,547 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "Lawrence Stoskopf" <stoskopf@tri.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:05:34 GMT
I actually would like to see yet another category: I don't like staying up all night fighting 80 and 40. Would like to see an upper band section. At this stage of the cycle, 15 and even 10 open for a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00143.html (9,197 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: BobK8IA@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:47:28 EDT
Winding the clock back again.......ARRL DX Test offered High Band and Low Band entry classes back, what, 30+ yrs ago? 73, Bob K8IA Arizona USA _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00146.html (9,192 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:56:34 -0400
At one point the ARRL DX had a high band (20 to 10) and a low band (160, 80, 40) category. Dave K4JRB up At gets _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00177.html (10,130 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:37:41 -0400
Well, here's an idea. How about a three-band category. Submit scores for any three bands of your choosing. Pick the best bands according to propagation. That way, you're not locked into 10-20 if they
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00220.html (9,412 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: Peter Hutter <phutter@Princeton.EDU>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:27:14 -0400
Bob, I think you'll have a better chance competing against a VY2 in the ARRL SSB DX during the sunspot maximum. In the mean time, plan on buliding a bigger station. This is another way to catch up. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00256.html (8,550 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:59:54 -0400
I don't know that I favor a three band category for ARRL DX Contests. I like to encourage operating even on marginal bands, so I would probably prefer only an all band category. An all band or a sing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00259.html (9,757 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:16:41 EDT
In a message dated 4/11/05 9:35:31 PM Greenwich Standard Time, k4bai@worldnet.att.net writes: However, the SP DX Contest, run the first weekend in April each year, implemented for the first time this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00266.html (8,461 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "Nathan Moreschi" <n4ydu@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:22:39 +0100
What happened to being content with participating and reaching personal goals? This reminds me of sad youth sports situation when everyone gets a trophy. I'm opposed to watering awards down. The cate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00267.html (11,122 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:21:41 -0700
I've added SO3B as a category to choose for the SP DX Contest 3830 web form. If any others who have already posted their SP DX score rumor want their class changed to SO3B, please send me an e-mail.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00273.html (9,473 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: "David Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:33:20 -0700
Bruce's comment gave me a bright idea (or, at least I thought it was bright). The real payoff for me in any contest is to look at the 3830 results on Monday morning to see how I did compared to every
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00278.html (10,591 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's change the ARRLDX rules (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:50:14 -0700
Along the same lines, why not show the ARRL Section as part of the entry for ARRL Contests and Zone number for CQWWDX. Gives you a better idea of how you stacked up against others in your same sectio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00283.html (10,654 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu