Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Leave\s+CQ\s+WW\s+alone\.\.\.roll\s+up\s+a\s+new\s+DX\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Leave\s+CQ\s+WW\s+alone\.\.\.roll\s+up\s+a\s+new\s+DX\s+contest\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Leave CQ WW alone...roll up a new DX contest (score: 1): Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:08:51 -0800 (PST); say.<< My say would be that the ultimate rule alteration for DX contests would be to adopt the CW Sprint QSY rule. It would eliminate stations from staking out a CQ frequency, would help mimimize th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00122.html (8,594 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leave CQ WW alone...roll up a new DX contest (score: 1): Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:21:21 -0500; And a 24-hour DX contest with Sprint QSY rules would virtually assure that no casual ops would make any contacts. You would have to have a LOT of dedicated contesters with knowledge of the rules to s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00128.html (7,053 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]