Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LOTW\s+Percentage\,\s+other\s+observations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+LOTW\s+Percentage\,\s+other\s+observations\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage, other observations (score: 1): Author: jpescatore@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:05:04 -0500; I just got back on the air in January, so all my data is for the past two months. About 50% of the contacts are casual DXing, the other half from part time efforts in the various NA and DX contests s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00435.html (8,297 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage, other observations (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:48:40 -0700; Are there bad spots? Sure there are. I don't know the percentage, but I don't think it's nearly as dire as you portray. Part of what distinguishes good operators from poor ones is the ability to log; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00446.html (7,894 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage, other observations (score: 1): Author: jpescatore@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:03:37 -0500; It's not just the bad spots. It's the cheerleading, self-spotting, etc. It's the use of spots to talk to one other connected ham (to extend the email analogy, this is like reply all in email when you; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00450.html (8,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]