- 1. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-850 vs TS-870 (score: 1)
- Author: dcopeland@wwn.net (Dan Copeland)
- Date: Wed Dec 3 19:47:25 1997
- I was just wondering which one is the better radio. I have heard that the 850 is the better but I would like some other opinions. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administ
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00073.html (6,892 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-850 vs TS-870 (score: 1)
- Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O. Hachadorian)
- Date: Thu Dec 4 00:13:30 1997
- On Wed, 03 Dec 1997 19:47:25 -0600 Dan Copeland <dcopeland@wwn.net> writes: The 870 was reviewed in a recent QST, and had one serious shortcoming: Loud adjacent signals sneaked around the DSP filter.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00077.html (7,666 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-850 vs TS-870 (score: 1)
- Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington)
- Date: Thu Dec 4 10:28:37 1997
- The TS-870 lacks a cw filter ahead of the DSP. Kenwood attempts to compensate by passband shifting of the two SSB filters to narrow the bandwidth, but that doesn't result in a great CW filter. As a r
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00083.html (7,502 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-850 vs TS-870 (score: 1)
- Author: yates@netride.com (John Yates)
- Date: Fri Dec 5 06:18:24 1997
- Just replaced my TS-940/500hz filters with a new TS-870. No comparison. The 870 has the quietest receiver I've ever heard and handles the wall of sound on 75 meter phone better than I have ever heard
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00097.html (7,255 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Kenwood TS-850 vs TS-870 (score: 1)
- Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike)
- Date: Fri Dec 5 14:56:48 1997
- Boy I was beginning to think I was the only one in the country who liked the 870...I agree with the quiet receiver, and it is sure nice to dial in a cw sig, with a guy 100 hz away, turn the filter d
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00101.html (7,742 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu