Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+K2\s+and\s+contesting\s+\-\s+Impressions\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+K2\s+and\s+contesting\s+\-\s+Impressions\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] K2 and contesting - Impressions? (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:21:50 EST; I'd like to hear from anyone using a K2 in contests, especially RTTY and CW. Your impressions of this radio - esp the receiver - under contest conditions will be appreciated. Thanks and 73, Don - K4B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00324.html (7,402 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] K2 and contesting - Impressions? (score: 1): Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:57:34 -0800 (PST); I love the k2/100 for CW contesting and it is not all that bad on SSB. I have a PROII also and like the audio from the K2 much better. I have operated NAQP on both SSB and CW, but I have not operated; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00331.html (9,082 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] K2 and contesting - Impressions? (score: 1): Author: "BlakeM" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2030 20:45:02 -0500; I've had a K2/100 in the shack for a couple of months now with my MP, and have operated a a few contests. Some observations: - SWR foldback is wicked agressive, the rig chokes on my ICE 419's. The SW; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00337.html (8,933 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] K2 and contesting - Impressions? (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:53:56 -0500; On Jan 19, 2004, at 2:21 PM, K4BEV@aol.com wrote: I'd like to hear from anyone using a K2 in contests, especially RTTY and CW. Your impressions of this radio - esp the receiver - under contest condit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00110.html (9,318 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]