Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+It\'s\s+not\s+the\s+sunspots\,\s+folks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+It\'s\s+not\s+the\s+sunspots\,\s+folks\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks (score: 1): Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:49:44 -0400; Yeah, CQ WW SSB was tough. I was hoping to pick up Zone 2 on 160m, but I heard none of the active stations - even when they were spotted. Unfortunately the declining portion of a solar cycle (where w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00011.html (7,783 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] It's not the sunspots, folks (score: 1): Author: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 18:58:01 -0400; "So when we double the frequency from 160m to 75/80m, the ionospheric absorption decreases by one fourth. It would decrease even more (by one sixteenth) on 40m." I should made it more clear by saying; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00021.html (7,635 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]