Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Is\s+it\s+a\s+time\s+to\s+change\s+rules\s+for\s+HQ\s+stns\s+in\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Valeri Stefanov" <wally@el-soft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:01:22 +0300
Peter, Yes, I am normal person my friend. Just see the statistics below and you will understand that at some point good sense is lost by some HQ stns IARU 2005 QSOs made with own country GB5HQ - 3120
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00204.html (8,852 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:52:30 +0200
Wally, No, I would not. If I sit at DF0CG on 20 or 15m with the band most of the time open to the US or other DX, being called by DLs 50% of the time and making contacts with them, is a waste of time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00228.html (7,903 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:22:03 +0200
T90HQ 160: 213 24 33 OE1A 160: 400 503 38 OM6HQ 160: 424 358 39 4N9HQ 160: 428 265 39 OL4HQ 160: 440 277 40 OP0HQ 160: 470 196 46 DA0HQ 160: 1199 1205 42 VA3RAC 160: 154 0 9 NU1AW 160: 256 155 19 W1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00258.html (7,052 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:58:31 +0200
Yes, as I wrote, on the low bands they are more valuable because there are generally less qso points. On the high bands while working DLs they can&acute;t work 3 and 5-pointers. If you take away a to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00260.html (8,553 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:12:39 +0200
DF3KV: Assume instead working 5000 DLs, 2000? more 3 and 5 point contacts during the same operating time would be of better value ;-) Germany is based in Central Europe very active zone 28 and your a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00268.html (7,620 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:00:46 +0200
Mario, the 20m average points per qso is 3 already 73 Peter DF3KV: Assume instead working 5000 DLs, 2000? more 3 and 5 point contacts during the same operating time would be of better value ;-) Germa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00271.html (8,397 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic', S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:40:24 +0200
Sure it is as you average 5 points DX on 20 m with equal number of 1 point DL! Overall DA0HQ average is only 2 points due to zone 28 legacy curse :-) 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU P.S. I'll be with YU6AO m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00273.html (8,355 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:52:25 +0200
EA5HQ: Specialy we noted a lack of contacts with EA stations, with only 147 EA QSO. There is a lot of hidden growth potential in here! 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU ________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00285.html (7,824 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: Jose Miguel Femenia Herrero EA5DFV <ea5dfv@uv.es>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:28:30 +0200 (CEST)
Hello Mario! Oh! Thanks :-) But, please, don't worry about that. We have 10 times more contacts with DL stations that with EA stations: QSOs == DL -- 1473 W -- 1366 UA -- 823 SP -- 495 I -- 470 F --
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00296.html (9,302 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in (score: 1)
Author: Martin Monsalvo <mmonsalvo@lombardilujan.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:59:26 -0300
Hola Jos&eacute;: You are absolutely right! I believe we all should imitate the DLs encouraging hams to join a contest. Giving certificates, or anything like that. I believe the overall result will b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00302.html (10,608 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu