Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Internet\s+Radio\s+Abusers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers (score: 1)
Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:34:04 -0600
This is how I plan to handle internet radio abusers. First I should define an internet radio abuser. An operator who uses a remote station beyond say a distance of 20 miles from their operating locat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00045.html (7,290 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:03:25 -0800
Hi Doug, And when I remote my PEI station, how will you know when I'm actually there or sitting at my home QTH remoting? 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00052.html (7,709 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Short internet runs (under 20 miles) are OK. Longer internet runs are Abusive. Got it. Somebody needs to call the FCC and tell them to revise  §97.3(a)(39) and §97.109(c) to reflect this limitation o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00053.html (9,103 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers (score: 1)
Author: George K5KG via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 22:42:24 -0500
YIKES! On 11/5/2015 7:34 PM, Doug Renwick wrote: This is how I plan to handle internet radio abusers. First I should define an internet radio abuser. An operator who uses a remote station beyond say
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00054.html (8,995 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers (score: 1)
Author: "ScottW3TX@verizon.net" <scottw3tx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 23:05:10 -0500
Why not 1000ft, or 5 miles, or 10 miles or 63 miles? Best regards, Scott This is how I plan to handle internet radio abusers. First I should define an internet radio abuser. An operator who uses a re
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00055.html (8,809 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:06:45 -0700
As if anyone cares, Doug. Besides, how do you plan to police this sort of thing? Since the rules allow such operations, nobody really needs to declare anything other than where their transmitter/rece
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00057.html (9,698 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers (score: 1)
Author: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:01:44 -0700
And if P5 were to come on the air as a remote station I am sure none of you would work it...... And when I remote my PEI station, how will you know when I'm actually there or sitting at my home QTH r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00075.html (8,490 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu