Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Interlock\s+hardware\s+\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Interlock\s+hardware\s+\?\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Ruz / CO8DM" <co8dm@frcuba.co.cu>; Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 10:58:25 -0400; Hi Contesters, Definitely we need an Interlock hardware for our MULT station. We will use 3 Icom´s radios. What kind of Interlock Hardware do you suggest to avoid 2 signals in the same band? Is possi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00165.html (6,725 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: Jamie WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:06:04 -0400; You don't need one for a MULT station....but if you are talking two radios on the same band, you need one.....we built one for cqww rtty using an arduino ..... _______________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00167.html (8,080 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: Juan Hidalgo EA8RM <EA8RM@ure.es>; Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 17:10:35 +0100; a great solution we use at EA8URL / EF8U http://ea4tx.com/es/ea4tx-interlock/ -- *73s de EA8RM <http://www.qrz.com/db/EA8RM> (ex EA8CAC)* _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00184.html (8,322 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: Ricardo Navarrete <ricardoea4zk@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:29:38 +0200; I'm totally agree with Juan, after some contest using EA4TX's interlocks . The best choice. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00188.html (9,265 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 21:17:22 -0400; interesting to read the reaction times, and wondering , what is an acceptable reaction time? In reading the specs, it appears it is indeed possible to have two (or more) signals on the air at a time,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00247.html (9,432 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: "Juan EA5RS" <ea5rs@ono.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:41:10 +0200; Jamie The output power risetime (key closure to output power appearance at ANT output) of a typical transmitter is in the 1-5 millisecond range. The reaction time is much shorter than a millisecond,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00249.html (10,789 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: Jose Ramon <jr.hierro@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:18:04 +0200; Jaime, most interlock's rf stage shares amp and tx antennas, toggling them between the two stations, so it's not possible to have two signals at the same time. 73 José, EA7KW ________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00252.html (10,555 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Interlock hardware ??? (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:31:11 -0400; only mentioned it because the specs on the EA4TX website mention around 300 ms reaction time.....I "think" thats probably enough, just wondered what others thought.... --Original Message-- From: Juan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-10/msg00262.html (11,502 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]