Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ID\s+vs\s+no\s+ID\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ID\s+vs\s+no\s+ID\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ID vs no ID (score: 1): Author: "Toivo Hallikivi" <toivo.hallikivi@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 15:45:26 +0200; Hello, After reading numerous posts about stations not ID:ing frequently enough in contests I got puzzled why no-one has suggested asking the running station for his call. When I do S&P in a multi-op; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00004.html (8,628 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ID vs no ID (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 06:47:17 +0400; Perfectly and balanced expressed Toivo! Exaggeration in either direction is counterproductive. Common sense should prevail. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00015.html (9,630 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ID vs no ID (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 03:10:30 +0600; Just returned from West Africa Toivo.Your approach works there as well. The only difference was, I had to ID every 6 or 7 QSO when pileup was really heavy.There are other methods of pileup management; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00023.html (11,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]