Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Help\s+on\s+choice\s+of\s+CW\s+Narrow\s+filter\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: l38217@alfa.ist.utl.pt (Pedro Pedroso)
Date: Thu Apr 15 13:53:59 1999
Hello ! I am a very active operator on the HF bands. I started CW only a few years ago and liked it so much that it is my most comon mode of operation today. For all this time I have never used a CW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00110.html (8,740 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 15 10:48:51 1999
<< Since my equipment supports only one filter I must choose between the 500Hz or the 250Hz filter. At first I thought that the 250Hz would be the best one, but on second thoughts maybe it is too nar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00114.html (8,869 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: ron.stordahl@digikey.com (Ron Stordahl)
Date: Thu Apr 15 10:33:17 1999
Pedro I have used 250 Hz for years in contests and DXing with my ICOM781. Its fairly rare that those calling me, and remember this occurs only if you are running CQ, are off far enough to cause a pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00116.html (8,477 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne)
Date: Thu Apr 15 16:58:00 1999
HI Pedro. When I had my FT-102, it came with a 500 cycle filter in it. It worked good for casual operating, and I thought it was just what I needed. When I got into my first CW contest with that filt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00119.html (8,001 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner)
Date: Thu Apr 15 13:53:33 1999
Personally, I like the 500 Hz filter in my FT-1000D for running. I really don't like keeping one hand on the RIT all the time, and I use my brain's DSP to do additional filtering :.) During ARRL CW,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00120.html (8,199 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX)
Date: Fri Apr 16 04:09:41 1999
Pedro If you are serious about CW contesting go for the 250Hz filter. It takes a bit of getting used to . When I am "running" on freq I use the RIT to jog back and forth a few 10's of Khz to get the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00131.html (8,169 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: cwman@juno.com (Fred W Hoffert)
Date: Fri Apr 16 12:55:56 1999
A conservative approach but I agree. Plus, I find that to actually find a run frequency I have to hit the 250 hz filter on the IC765 to settle down between two other STRONG signals. Won't do too much
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00134.html (10,802 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Help on choice of CW Narrow filter (score: 1)
Author: k7qq@juno.com (Rex J Maner)
Date: Sat Apr 17 05:31:36 1999
Hello Pedro My 2 cents worth from an old QUACK K7QQ I agree with the wider filter width for CW, I use the TS-970 and on CW the maxium bandwidth is 1 khz with 600 hz 400 hz 200 hz. 100 hz 50 hz steps
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-04/msg00159.html (12,921 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu