Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Hello\s+old\s+friend\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Hello\s+old\s+friend\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Hello old friend! (score: 1): Author: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 17:30:26 -0400; Nice to see the annual Sweepstakes "check" thing again. We even get sort of a bonus "two-fer" deal this time, with a little "what is/isn't assisted" tossed into the mix. About three ops like to tweak; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-10/msg00177.html (7,224 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hello old friend! (score: 1): Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 21:57:53 -0400; Anybody for a double bonus? Should we use cut numbers to send one's check? If so, should one log it as "71" or "7A"? 73 - Jim K8MR --Original Message-- From: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@cinci.rr.com> To:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-10/msg00179.html (7,735 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hello old friend! (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 04:12:19 -0500; I may have told this story before in one of the many times this subject has been discussed but just like watching Christmas Vacation and Caddy Shack once a year it's worth telling again. I had to smi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-10/msg00180.html (8,787 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Hello old friend! (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:46:18 -0700; The rules dont say anything about the number base for the check. How about sending the check in hexadecimal to really mess folks up. Lets see, 1958 would be 3A That could give us several discussions; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-10/msg00190.html (9,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]