Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Have\s+SSB\s+Contest\s+become\s+the\s+\"most\s+pure\"\s+contests\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Have\s+SSB\s+Contest\s+become\s+the\s+\"most\s+pure\"\s+contests\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Have SSB Contest become the "most pure" contests? (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:16:27 -0500; Its ironic, that because of the digital characteristics of the CW transmission, its been sucked into the processed and distributed world of the internet and changed the face of contesting. Skimmer an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00073.html (9,318 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Have SSB Contest become the "most pure" contests? (score: 1): Author: "Don Butler" <n5lz@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:49:26 -0700; Every contest QSO needs a CQer and an S&Per, and successful stations need to devote time to each. I live in a state (Utah) with a relatively small number of active contesters and an even smaller numb; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00084.html (11,974 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Have SSB Contest become the "most pure" contests? (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:32:59 -0900; He Ed: Bingo (though I'm always gonna prefer CW!) ...One of the things we all do ...is ....pretty much what we think everyone else is doing at that moment. I operated Assisted in this one ...but I do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00090.html (12,581 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]