Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s+Versions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s+Versions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio Versions (score: 1): Author: jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 06:16:25 -0400; The magic of this hobby (ham radio in general, contesting in particular) is that it has always enabled all versions and niches to operate simultaneously. Luckily, radios continue to include tuning kn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00369.html (7,127 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio Versions (score: 1): Author: Wes Plouff <nwplouff@wideopenwest.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:27:42 -0400; (Tacking onto the improved topic name, much better than "America's Cup.") To all the "ham radio 2.0" naysayers, wouldn't it help to see what N0AX actually had to say before criticizing it? The video; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00377.html (8,797 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ham Radio Versions (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:28:37 -0500; Sorry, the "get out of the way" was my poor choice of words. That isn't really what I meant. You're right; there's a lot more to it than cluster spots and remote operating. I haven't watched that vid; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00378.html (12,607 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]