Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Growing\s+New\s+Contesters\s+with\s+LOTW\s+\-\s+suddenly\s+it\'s\s+1977\s+again\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977 again (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:04:36 -0400
It's time for ARRL to take the next big step to increase the value of LOTW. Done properly, it could increase ARRL's revenue from LOTW substantially, while encouraging a lot of new hams and DXers to b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00398.html (8,984 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977 again (score: 1)
Author: "kl7ra" <kl7ra@ptialaska.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:47:06 -0400
Pete mentions logs that were submitted for contest credit could be used for award credit as was done many years ago. The problem is LoTW has many steps or hoops that may be a show stopper as it is ri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00409.html (10,431 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977 again (score: 1)
Author: Mark Perrin <mperrin@ordata.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:23:44 -0700
And while making a wish list, how about a propagation study from LoTW data LoTW has real QSL data, except for power and antenna, in the data base. Would make for interesting report to analyze who is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00412.html (11,447 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977 again (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:41:07 -0400
OK, maybe I'm slow on the uptake today since I'm still recovering from the kid's wedding... But I still don't get it. You're done with the contest. You send one email to the contest sponsor, whomever
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00427.html (13,050 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977 again (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 22:01:46 -0400
Are you saying that Wayne is or was the reason that LotW isn't being accepted by more contesters? --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00428.html (13,856 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Growing New Contesters with LOTW - suddenly it's 1977 again (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:56:37 -0400
OK... imagine this: During a major non-ARRL contest (which one? Not important), someone pops up using a call that appears to be from rare DXCC entity Lower ToemahtoeZoup. The station operates a signi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00429.html (14,501 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu