I was going to submit this for publication in NCJ, but local response has been good enough and the topic is timely enough so that I decided not to wait. Moreover, this reflector is read around the wo
Hi Pete...sounds good to me...keep the pressure on..de Rick nq4i _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
I have learned many lessons over the years. One that I've learned is that Amateur Radio contests are simply "coordinated operating activities". As long as you play nice (and by the intent of the "rul
Amen & Amen. I applaud your anti-nightmare efforts so club circle administrators can also sleep better. A rational suggestion to be sure. <snip> Here's where it gets a bit tricky. For the ARRL radius
Okay, where cans't one find the definition of the geographical area specified by CQ for its contests? It isn't in the WPX rules. The only reference to geographical area is in paragraph XIII XIII. Clu
WPX Phone and CW are the 2 CQ contests that specify "local geographic area" only. 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
Hi, Just a note from Australia about club / station participation rules for some contest events down (under) here.. "Stations can be located within a 500m circle OR within the boundaries of the prope
Hi Pete: This is a GREAT idea. As an officer of PVRC, I am involved in issues about our club territory. Having to clearly communicate with our membership about WHICH contests they CAN and CANNOT cont
This is a win-win. Standardization would make things easier on the clubs and the sponsors. Lets have ONE COMMON CIRCLE that is acknowledged for all contests. This makes enforcement a LOT easier on ev