Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Preliminary\s+2010\s+CQ\s+WPX\s+SSB\/CW\s+Contest\s+Rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Preliminary\s+2010\s+CQ\s+WPX\s+SSB\/CW\s+Contest\s+Rules\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Preliminary 2010 CQ WPX SSB/CW Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: kenlow7@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:32:02 -0500; occur it's the wrong way to go. I guess you need to remove SO2R possibility as single op soon to, since that can also be abused...*shakes my head* I was looking forward to do M/S in WPX but not anym; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00396.html (9,051 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Preliminary 2010 CQ WPX SSB/CW Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:51:51 -0500; I am planning to go to Bonaire for CQ WPX 2010 for M/S. It would likely have been with three ops (KU8E for sure). With the rule change, I guess two ops will be all that we can keep busy. But, I am co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00404.html (8,324 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]