Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Field\s+day\s+no\-coders\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Field\s+day\s+no\-coders\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com); Date: Wed May 31 23:21:17 2000; hey gang, I have a question about field day--on the novice/tech station, IF a we use a couple of tech +'s to set up & operate the novice/tech station, using a TECH+ call, can a NO-CODE tech operate &; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00000.html (6,358 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders); Date: Thu Jun 1 00:40:54 2000; There is no question about it, you can't do it! FD Rule 4.1.1 states "This station may only be operated by Novice/Technician Plus licensees." Oddly enough, I couldn't find any reference in this year'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00000.html (8,166 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu Jun 1 06:29:34 2000; control op, sure, but are your "hard-core" folks really that "hard?" On our FDs, there is always plenty to do till the gun sounds, but lots of operating time available on the "regular" stations, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00005.html (8,839 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: davidg@primenet.com (David Gilbert); Date: Thu Jun 1 07:38:20 2000; Pete, I agree fully. The rules allow any station to have even unlicensed operators as long as a licensed op is in control of it. The Field Day rule merely specifies novice/tech control ops for the no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00015.html (9,558 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Thu Jun 1 15:15:52 2000; This is not strictly true. The station may be operated by ANYONE, even someone without a license, as long as a CONTROL operator is present with the required operating license. But leaving the "no cod; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00019.html (8,751 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: n5nj@gte.net (Robert Naumann); Date: Thu Jun 1 12:08:25 2000; "This station may only be operated by Novice/Technician Plus licensees." I believe the intent here is that these Novice & Tech types actually do the operating - not the experienced Extras etc. that c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00023.html (8,591 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: W2CE@aol.com (W2CE@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 1 14:41:17 2000; With the novice license disappearing following the recent restructuring it will become semiextinct in a few years. Novices will soon find their way to the General and beyond. The Tech Plus is even cl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00032.html (8,963 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders); Date: Fri Jun 2 08:51:34 2000; I suspect Bob is correct about the future. The FD rules have long made an allowance for canadians FD'ers, where there are no novice or tech plus licenses. For VE's, the novice/tech station is to be s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00045.html (9,839 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders); Date: Fri Jun 2 09:00:39 2000; I agree with Neal EXCEPT, once again I must point out that the control operator concept is an FCC rule but we are talking about a more restrictive FD rule set by the FCC (as Bob, N5NJ points out). Th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00047.html (11,843 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: anders@erols.com (Roland A. Anders); Date: Fri Jun 2 09:16:24 2000; See my and Bob N5NJ's answers to the no-code, non-licensed operation of the novice/tech plus station--it ain't legal according to the ARRL rules. (Though it would be ok with the FCC, the ARRL does no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00054.html (10,898 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Fri Jun 2 13:33:58 2000; Here's the specific rule that applies from the FD 2000 Rules: 4.1.1. Any Class A group whose entry classification is two or more transmitters may also operate one dedicated Novice / Technician Plus o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00056.html (9,897 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: pk@ij.net (Paul E. Knupke, Jr.); Date: Fri Jun 2 10:27:42 2000; It is quite clear but our local multi-club field day dropped doing a novice/tech+ station this year because we can't find any novice or tech+ operators now that restructuring has taken place. Now we; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00062.html (8,987 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1): Author: dhenderson@arrl.org (Henderson, Dan N1ND); Date: Thu Jun 8 08:38:18 2000; Hi All: I am sorry for the delay in responding, as I have been out of the office at a Convention and there was a death in the family while I was gone. To clarify the rule... The novice / tech plus st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00170.html (8,312 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]