Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+and\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+and\s+CW\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: KE3F@prodigy.net; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:52:07 -0500; Well, FD was quite a hoot with PVRC- my first major effort in many years. Served as primary relief CW op and got a chance to do code on 5 of 6 HF bands. Anyhow, was chatting with a couple of the othe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00300.html (8,990 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:16:50 -0400; Rich: The 15-minute per band/mode rule discourages operating on marginal bands, such as 160 and 10M. You are stuck on a band/mode if you make one contact and you may go the next 15 minutes calling CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00303.html (8,862 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: Chris Hurlbut <c_hurlbut@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:51:09 -0400; Actually at the W7UQ Field Day, our CW rate was much much higher than our fone rate. We could just never really get anything going on phone, but CW was always there when we wanted. -Chris KL9A ______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00309.html (10,002 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:53:27 -0500 (CDT); We just discussed this on the vhfcontesting reflector last week. The 15 minutes per band change rule does not apply to the VHF bands on Field Day or any other ARRL contest. 73, Zack W9SZ ____________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00310.html (8,591 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:21:08 EDT; Where do you NOT beg for FD QSO's on 10??? I have never had much luck on 10 CW from the midwest, even 25 years ago! I did a small 1E from home, & had a TON of CW QSO's, never a shortage. I have done; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00314.html (8,312 bytes)
6. RE: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: "Mike D." <hrg@cifnet.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:42:05 -0500; We made ZERO contacts on 10m and only a few on 15m. The bands that generated great rates were 20m, 40m and 80m. BTW, this year we decided to try some phone contacts. We stopped at 10 (1%). No thanks; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00316.html (8,635 bytes)
7. RE: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: "David Riley" <driley@n8ia.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:52:39 -0400; I spent most of the evening hanging around calling CQ near the bottom of 40 and 80. I noticed two things in general about the QSO's I made. First, I was running about 25wpm most of the time, but it s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00317.html (8,871 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: "Stephen M. Murphy" <murphys@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:07:37 -0400; Ditto. We try to be competitive in 1A, and the 15 minute rule definitely is a factor in deciding whether to operate certain bands. seldom dropped below 50/hr (the lowest I saw was mid 40s at 5AM Sund; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00318.html (10,158 bytes)
9. RE: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: "Robert Brandon" <rbrandon@austin.ibm.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:13:15 -0500; I had the same experience. CW was steady. It was hard to get phone runs going. Robert K5PI --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00320.html (10,742 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:49:07 -0400; "Robert Brandon" <rbrandon@austin.ibm.com> wrote: "CW was steady. It was hard to get phone runs going." Not from here! In the first 55 minutes, I made 125 contacts on 40 SSB. I'm sure that I could ha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00327.html (8,716 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:32:21 -0500 (CDT); I think or club (K9CU) had only a couple people working CW at all this year - me and one other. We had two stations set up for SSB (10/15 and 40/75 meters) and one station for 20 SSB and all CW bands; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00328.html (9,880 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and CW (score: 1): Author: "Stephen M. Murphy" <murphys@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:09:40 -0400; far Absolutely. Any endeavor requiring skill and technique requires practice. Effectively operating an amateur station under pressure, whether in a real emergency or a contest situation, is no differ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00329.html (8,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]