Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FTDX10\s+and\s+FTDX101MP\s+vs\.\s+FT1000MP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FTDX10\s+and\s+FTDX101MP\s+vs\.\s+FT1000MP\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FTDX10 and FTDX101MP vs. FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: kq2m@kq2m.com; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:27:30 -0600; Hi, I'm hearing very good things about these two new radios FTDX10 and FTDX101MP - I'm wondering what, if anything, you have heard and how they compare to the FT1000MP which I have used for the past; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00150.html (6,732 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FTDX10 and FTDX101MP vs. FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:17:53 -0500; Bob please post a summary of your direct responses regarding the FTDX10/FTDX101MP. At one time I was also owned a number of Yaesu FT1000MP Mark-Vs I am also wondering what transceiver contesters are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00156.html (7,521 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FTDX10 and FTDX101MP vs. FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:20:23 -0800; Last I heard, top contester N6TV was pretty happy with his K4. Another top contester, neighbor K6XX, whose K3s were destroyed in the wildfire that took his entire home, told me he's starting to appre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00169.html (8,792 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FTDX10 and FTDX101MP vs. FT1000MP (score: 1): Author: kq2m@kq2m.com; Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 07:56:57 -0600; I want to thank the many ops who were kind enough to their thoughts, experiences and insights on on the FTDX10 and the FTDX101MP vs. the FT1000MP as well as on other radios. I have never chased tech; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-12/msg00024.html (9,279 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]