Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FT4\s+\*is\*\s+a\s+contesting\s+mode\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:09:55 -0400
Hi Barry, Why bother with RF? Just move it to the internet. You can't hear it, anyway. Because RF is what makes it Radio, not the data processing part. Those not interested in the RF part have alread
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00033.html (6,658 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 12:11:27 +0100
I think the time has come for me to make the unfortunate but necessary decision I have long been thinking on. This group has been hijacked by people who think FT(x) is part of true contesting. It mig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00045.html (8,580 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. (score: 1)
Author: OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 14:59:30 +0200
An idea came to my mind yesterday; What about making a new mail-group called "FT8/4/? competiton". Then this Contest mail-group will concentrate on HF Contesting using radio and human beings. Just a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00047.html (9,830 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. (score: 1)
Author: ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 14:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
Please, no more groups. It would be more like a nightmare, it seems to me. Amateur radio is already getting too fragmented. Contests are contests.  There are underlying similarities to all of them, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00048.html (8,864 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:19:56 -0400
Hi Mats - it's your call, of course, but in my 24 or so years on CQ-Contest (and on Towertalk, before CQ-Contest was born), I've seen these things come and go many times.  I would encourage the moder
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00049.html (10,430 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:22:54 -0400
"Using radio and human beings" So this means no more discussion using software, and tools like skimmer and super check partial? Ria N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00053.html (11,658 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 *is* a contesting mode. (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 07:59:52 -0700
I suggest that discussions like this be moved over to the rttydigital reflector https://groups.io/g/rttydigital In November of 2018, folks on the rtty Reflector got tired of seeing postings about FT8
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-06/msg00055.html (11,250 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu