Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FCC\s+Rules\s+on\s+Pecuniary\s+Interest\s+\[was\:Station\-Specific\s+Incentives\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+FCC\s+Rules\s+on\s+Pecuniary\s+Interest\s+\[was\:Station\-Specific\s+Incentives\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC Rules on Pecuniary Interest [was:Station-Specific Incentives] (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:11:00 -0700; _________________________________________________ That's been the rule since the '50s if not before. What is your point? -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00750.html (9,682 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FCC Rules on Pecuniary Interest [was:Station-Specific Incentives] (score: 1): Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT); Hi Bill, The point is that the rules are simple, unambiguous (as you point out, too) and the word "pecuniary" (found in the FCC rules) is clearly defined in the dictionary. There is no need to -- as; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00764.html (10,203 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]