Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Exchanges\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Exchanges\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: "Robert Higgins" <rwhiggins@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:33:05 -0500; A serial number is good: the idea that you can't use a serial number because someone could copy it the QSO before and add one for theirs isn't really valid. Ah, but! If K4LW is doing a multi/multi an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00641.html (8,930 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:40:00 -0600 (CST); You still have to COPY it, don't you? I've done that many times. In SS, if I come across a new mult and my logger says a mult is worth 10 minutes, if it takes me 8 minutes to get thru the pileup I've; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00645.html (7,618 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:58:41 -0000; How about going from the sublime to the ridiculous..??.. I'm suggesting K1EA redo CT so that it sends random numbers instead of sequential. It won't effect the sender because the sender uses the F2 k; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00657.html (8,566 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: "Robert Higgins" <rwhiggins@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:02:35 -0500; I thought about a random number generator and also making it part of the popular contest logging programs. But this shuts out the casual guy who wants to play for an hour or two and not even use a lo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00658.html (7,600 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:45:32 -0600; OK, for a second, I thought Mal's suggestion was a clever tongue-in-cheek little joke. Then someone started taking it SERIOUSLY. Why do we care if it takes someone two or three QSOs to copy an exchan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00662.html (9,221 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:53:44 -0500; "Robert Higgins" wrote: "I thought about a random number generator and also making it part of the popular contest logging programs. But this shuts out the casual guy who wants to play for an hour or; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00667.html (8,059 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 24 Nov 2005 09:14:44 -0600; Might this also be destructive to club efforts in some cases? -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00669.html (8,542 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]