I find it interesting that an argument often proferred against the inclusion of a particular rule centres ('ers' for my non-QE-speaking friends) around enforceability. The true test of character is h
Author: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <afrugoli@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:39:07 -0500
I'm one of the "enforceability" folks. I have to disagree with your analysis. Some current rules are totally on the honor system, and they always will be. But I feel that adding new rules with litera
And what about publicly (more or less) stating that you won't enfore certain rules. For example, to go back to a topic that was discussed before-the SS rules say the check is the last 2 digits of the
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:38:36 -0000
You hit the nail on the head. Some ops use the year of first licencing of the station. Some use their own first year and others use a random number. As long as it's consistent throughout the contest