Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Efficiency\s+is\s+the\s+name\s+o\'\s+the\s+game\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Efficiency\s+is\s+the\s+name\s+o\'\s+the\s+game\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Efficiency is the name o' the game (score: 1): Author: w4pa@yahoo.com (Scott Robbins); Date: Wed Jun 7 08:10:29 2000; TIME advantage over the course of a contest, literally HOURS more spent receiving than the one radio guy. But Bill ? you?re missing the fundamental point of what contesting is. Contesting is not wor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00158.html (8,011 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Efficiency is the name o' the game (score: 1): Author: w7ti@jps.net (Bill Turner); Date: Wed Jun 7 11:01:05 2000; _________________________________________________________ If this were true (it's not) why do they list scores in descending order? Why not just randomly? Or not list them at all? After all, you know; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00162.html (8,524 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]