Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dupes\s+in\s+CQ\s+sponsored\s+contests\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:00:07 -0400 (EDT)
Even though I'm careful, some dupes often creep into my logs. In last weekend's WW RTTY there were two, one for certain and another where I'm not sure about the first QSO, whether I had it or not. Wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00302.html (6,908 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:10:04 -0500
Hello Kermit! There are no penalties for working and logging dupes in any contests that I am aware of. I believe it is always best to work and log all dupes, where guys call you again. This way, in c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00304.html (8,478 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:11:20 -0500
Hello Hank! It depends on the contest. A few contests will cause a busted QSO for "both" logs - if "either" log has the logged call sign wrong. It is always best to read the rules for the contest you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00305.html (8,763 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:30:09 -0400
Dupes are not penalized - you just don't get any credit for the second QSO! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00306.html (8,548 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:07:15 -0400
The rule is simple: leave them in the log - there is no penalty for dupes in your cabrillo file. No points for the dupes, but this way, the log checking software can work correctly. If dupes are remo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00307.html (8,990 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:22:36 -0700
The great part about the Cabrillo log submission format is that the dupes How does that work? What if he's calling because he busted my call the first time, but I got it right. I'm OK, I presume. Doe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00308.html (8,412 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:16:33 -0400 (EDT)
Kermit, I agree with Tim, K3LR. If a station that is calling you is a dupe, don't even question it. Just work him. It will save time and frustration for both of you. And Tim is correct, there are abs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00312.html (8,667 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in CQ sponsored contests (score: 1)
Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:02:43 +0100 (BST)
Sure you are ok Hank. In the other guys log there is no 'dupe'and he will get a bust for the first contact with the bad call. Your second contact is marked as a 'dupe' in your scored log with no pena
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00322.html (9,285 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu