Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Don\'t\s+forget\s+to\s+spot\s+in\s+CQWW\s+SSB\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 11:50:06 -0400
We have all gotten a little spoiled on CW with the RBN, whose 170+ nodes spot everything.  Just a reminder, then - Fort Meade has not yet released an SSB Skimmer, and until they do (write your Congre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00060.html (7,497 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:25:26 +0000 (UTC)
What's the rule for spotting if you are Unassisted? Be careful about using the Automatically Spot New S&P QSOs feature.  It's not unusual for me to make a mistake, mistype the call or just be deaf. 
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00061.html (9,285 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: PY2NY <py2ny.vitor@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:19:46 -0300
Good Question. I am always No-Assisted and this is why I never go to DXClusters, or never sent S&P spots... 73 DX . .. ... -- PY2NY / SP9NY / V26NY - Vitor Luis Aidar dos Santos http://military-jeep-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00064.html (10,212 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: John Dorr <cqk1ar@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:54:06 -0400
The CQWW rules allow for outbound spotting as an unassisted entry. However, my advice is that if you are unassisted to avoid any use of the cluster. Youre only inviting the possibility of unintended
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00065.html (10,456 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:08:11 -0400
No problem so long as you don't yourself use spots. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00066.html (10,182 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 17:10:51 -0400
I don't understand, John.  What are you worried about? 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>. For spots, please use your favorite "retail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00067.html (10,737 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 22:38:21 +0100
It's simple - "unassisted" ops risk being DQed for accidental or unintended cluster access/use. 73, Paul EI5DI 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at<http://beta.reverse
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00069.html (8,781 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 21:59:18 -0400
I'd expect nothing less from you, Paul, given your long opposition to all technological innovation - fact is, most cluster software has set/nodx or the equivalent, to make sure no spots come your way
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00071.html (10,345 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 22:03:33 -0400
Why would you be "better off" just "leaving the cluster disconnected altogether"?  Seems to me that for the other 50,000 or so participants who aren't in it to win, spotting is a real benefit.  After
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00072.html (13,156 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 08:47:24 +0100
Then, perhaps N4ZR will let us know the "real" reason for K1AR's warning about the consequences of unintended cluster access. With regard to technological innovation, I an opposed to "assisted" being
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00074.html (11,367 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:56:40 -0400
I'm a little perplexed myself, Paul. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. With
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00076.html (12,597 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:20:38 +0000 (UTC)
Well, I'm opposed to anyone who gets spotted considering themselves to be Unassisted.  Assistance works both ways.  It generates a QSO for the P&C station and for the running station.  This is why I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00077.html (13,385 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Kenneth Wolff <ken@k1ea.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:50:18 -0400
Automatic spotting by unassisted stations has been around for 30 years when CT implemented it. CT and almost all modern logging software does not allow unassisted users to see or use any cluster spot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00078.html (13,229 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:37:08 +0000
How about that? This is a position universally despised in the contest community. Im not sure that universally means all, but I completely agree. I would like nothing better than to go back to the da
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-10/msg00080.html (14,346 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu