- 1. [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:32:20 -0700
- What's with W6YX and all the domestic spotes this weekend? -- Tnx es 73 Dick W7ZR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contes
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00236.html (7,595 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
- Author: Dean Wood <n6de@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:22:25 -0800
- Hi Dick, I am often an operator at W6YX, and although I did not participate last weekend, I did speak to one of the operators today, and I'd be happy to answer your query. As you know, the ARRL DX CW
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00245.html (9,163 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
- Author: KI9A@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:31:20 EST
- W6YX has been thanked many times in the past by other stations for increasing their fun in contests by accurately spotting many stations to packet, and has been encouraged to continue to do so in fut
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00246.html (7,735 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:15:55 -0500
- Agreed. When I'm at a mult station at NQ4I, and I'm tuning around, I'll spot just about everything I find (unless it's been spotted recently). And this, I think, is how it should be. The spotting net
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00247.html (8,936 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
- Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:02:55 -0000
- Here we go again: I was a packet-cluster sysop at the very beginning. It has never, let me shout it, "NEVER", been considered good etiquette for USA stations to spot USA stations during a DX contest.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00255.html (12,057 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:42:06 -0500
- Yes, and at the very beginning, packet-cluster networks were tenuously connected by half-duplex 1200 bps and 2400 bps links. Throughput for spots was very low. Often the cluster back-bone was on a sh
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00266.html (11,565 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Spots (score: 1)
- Author: k1ttt@arrl.net
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:10:28 -0500 (EST)
- no it isn't. its a good thing! those 3 stations are interested in contesting, and are probably new at it. obviously they are uninformed about what is going on, but at least they are interested and t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00286.html (7,959 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu