Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Dead\s+horse\:\s+CQ\s+WW\s+rules\s+apparently\s+prohibit\s+CW\s+Skimmeruse\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CW Skimmeruse (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:29:41 -0400
I don't know how one can consider CW Skimmer, as long as it is running on hardware in the operator's own shack, to be "DX alerting assistance" instead of simply a technological way to operate an inf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00324.html (13,448 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CW Skimmeruse (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
The difference is whether the human -- the OPERATOR -- has primacy or the technology does. We have defined alerting assistance in contests to generally be obtaining callsign and frequency information
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00326.html (11,313 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CW Skimmeruse (score: 1)
Author: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:32:01 +0100
Scott Robbins a écrit : Let's consider an IC-7800 or FTDX9000. They show you a "peak" on their 2nd receiver, and they can decode it to tell you whose signal it is. In short, they can tell you the cal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00330.html (8,901 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu