FTdx-9000 that is. Tnx, Barry-- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
On May 16, 2004, at 11:45 AM, Barry wrote: FTdx-9000 that is. Or anything else interesting you saw. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever
Here is a link to the brochure that someone has already posted: http://www.edcjp.jp/Dayton/2004/FT-DX9000.html The radio was in a plastic display case, so no hands-on. It is a HUGE radio, over 21 inc
If there is not sub or B VFO knob, I am not interested. I like the UI of FT1000 series with separate knobs better. It makes operating much more efficient. OH0V single band records are thanks to two V
Here's a few more details based on my conversation with K7JA: Estimated price: 200W version: $11,500 400W version: $13,500 Specs (e.g. receiver performance) not finalized. Availability: Dec 2004 73 d
Here's a PDF of the brochure. It's clearer - if you have the PDF reader. http://www.vxstd.com/en/news/image/FTDX9000.pdf 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
About $11.5k for 200 watts and $13.5k for 400 watts is what I heard, when it becomes available. It's status seems to be about where the IC7800 was last year at Dayton, so it'll probably be a while. J
Howdy conquesters! I will report briefly on things that were of interest to me in the area of rigs, receiver performance and where are we going. If I had to judge by Icom and Yaesu offerings in the t
Oh, you mean the Pheasant Under Glass? The new rig was on a pedestal inside a Plexiglas case. It was clearly a non-working model; the two "displays" were just cutouts meant to show what they intend t
--On 2004-5-17 12:05 PM -0500 Jim Callow <jcallow@mari.net> wrote: About $11.5k for 200 watts and $13.5k for 400 watts is what I heard Wow! For that kind of money you would think they could at least
More specifically: The INRAD information is not currently on the web site. George told me they would update the data after they returned home (a leisurely trip back to the west coast in their RV). L
On May 16, 2004, at 9:41 PM, Greg wrote: Here is a link to the brochure that someone has already posted: http://www.edcjp.jp/Dayton/2004/FT-DX9000.html The radio was in a plastic display case, so no
Man, who would want to pay $13K for a radio? I looked at the pix and it looks like about 40 knobs and switches on the front panel. What do you think probably gets used regularly, 10 or 12? For $13K
On May 17, 2004, at 10:42 PM, Tom Osborne wrote: Man, who would want to pay $13K for a radio? I looked at the pix and it looks like about 40 knobs and switches on the front panel. What do you think p
My inflation calculator shows that a $13k radio today was a $2k radio in 1954. Not so far out of line is it? Of course I will not be ordering one unless Ed McMahon knocks on my door. Dick W7ZR ______
At 03:41 PM 5/18/2004, Richard Zalewski wrote: My inflation calculator shows that a $13k radio today was a $2k radio in 1954. Not so far out of line is it? Of course I will not be ordering one unless
Unfortunately, I can't afford the radio that I want: - HF + 6 meters - 200 watts output I think both the FT-9000 and IC-7800 have this, but they're 3x the cost of an Orion or top-of-the-line FT-1000.
The correct call is NC0B and Rob's web site is http://www.sherweng.com/ he should have latest data on receiver overload tests posted anytime soon. Thank you K3LR for pointing out error. Yuri ________
Very interesting presentation there. What I did not understand is why Orion with 500hz roofing filter is worse then Orion with 1 khz roofing at 2 kHz spaced dynamic range test? There is * on the seco
Orion with 500hz roofing filter is worse then Orion with 1 khz roofing at 2 kHz spaced dynamic range test? There is * on the second line of the table but no explanation what it means. Can somebody cl