- 1. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC (score: 1)
- Author: w3cf@home.com (Douglas Priest)
- Date: Wed May 16 22:48:32 2001
- Hello All......... While we are getting together for a WRTC meeting and you are thinking about that I'd like to give you one more topic to think about. As the new President of FRC I have been hearing
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00184.html (7,606 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC (score: 1)
- Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
- Date: Thu May 17 10:24:04 2001
- Congrats! (I hope Algore didn't give you hard time :-) We have been kicking this subject around here for a while. The "bosses" insist that we have to be punished for mistakes, while their wrongly ide
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00189.html (7,871 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC (score: 1)
- Author: ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Thu May 17 10:10:13 2001
- the contest gods spent about 3.5 mins discussing the 3 pt penality issue at visalia and resoundly voted to leave it in place! good luck at dayton! about Or same would you -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http:/
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00195.html (8,756 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC (score: 1)
- Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara)
- Date: Fri May 18 00:19:38 2001
- It's not really worth to look back because it's meaningless, each year and each contest has its own conditions and history. How to compare a result obtained 20 years ago with the typical poorer setup
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00200.html (9,154 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu