Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cross\-Entity\s+Remote\s+for\s+Contesting\s+and\s+DXCC\s+Now\.\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now.. (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:51:54 -0500
For those of you who are interested in cross-entity remote operation, it will now count for both contesting and DXCC, for stations on both ends of the QSO. The transmitter country will determine the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00169.html (7,215 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now.. (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:12:48 +0300
Just wonder what next step in Hybrid Contesting and Hybrid DXing will be... Only your own imaginarion and capacity of your computer and internet connection will be the limit tomortow. Sad development
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00170.html (9,001 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now.. (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:06:47 +0200
For those interested in operating CQWW remote: http://www.cqww.com/rules_xtreme.htm 73, Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00171.html (8,818 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now.. (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:42:56 +0000
For those of you who are interested in cross-entity remote operation, it will now count for both contesting and DXCC, for stations on both ends of the QSO. The transmitter country will determine the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00172.html (7,906 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now.. (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 07:29:58 -0600 (CST)
The Board voted based on the recommendation of the DXAC. The DXAC based their decision on input from the ARRL members. At least in theory. Of course, it would have been nice if the DXAC rep from each
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00174.html (9,141 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now.. (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:56:51 -0500
This category no longer exists for the CQWW Contest. It was terminated in the rules rewrite in 2013. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00175.html (10,210 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cross-Entity Remote for Contesting and DXCC Now.. (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 13:34:51 -0800 (PST)
The ARRL is a radio club in New England.  They have no responsibility for what means of communications any particular individual amateur engages in.   Your are free to use whatever means suits your o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-01/msg00180.html (9,589 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu