- 1. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1)
- Author: mkelley@chesapeake.net (mkelley@chesapeake.net)
- Date: Fri Feb 28 13:37:23 1997
- Hi, I'm considering getting a couple of people together to introduce them to contesting and spur some interest to upgrade. The question is, can the No-code Techs & Tech Plus operators participate in
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-02/msg00182.html (6,646 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1)
- Author: AA7NX@aol.com (AA7NX@aol.com)
- Date: Wed Mar 5 11:38:41 1997
- Isn't all of this technically irrelevant in a DX contest due to the Third Party rules? (Assuming you are a US licensed station/operator). This has always been a question in my mind. What do you think
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00070.html (7,901 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1)
- Author: hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver)
- Date: Wed Mar 5 09:16:18 1997
- Right you are! I nearly ran afoul of the "unlicensed op'r/third-part" rules when operating with my sons and one of their friends during an ARRL DX contest. Luckily, I avoided QSOs with Europe and As
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00071.html (7,776 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1)
- Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ronald D Rossi)
- Date: Wed Mar 5 12:30:22 1997
- This is a copy of some correspondence on this very subject in April 95.... -- 73 de KK1L ex N1PBT...ron (rrossi@btv.ibm.com) <>< Ron Rossi H/P SRAM Engineering -- IBM Microelectronics -- CQ-Contest o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00073.html (10,064 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1)
- Author: wa1uar@eecorp.com (Michael A. McCarthy)
- Date: Wed Mar 5 12:39:54 1997
- By the book, an unlicensed op cannot be the "control" operator. A fully licensed individual must be present and in "control" at all times. An unlicensed individual or one using priviledges beyond hi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00075.html (8,334 bytes)
- 6. [CQ-Contest] Control Op in Contest? (score: 1)
- Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel)
- Date: Fri Mar 7 00:35:48 1997
- Gee... This is NOT my understanding of this statement. I have always taken this "exception" to mean that if (for example) KR2Q chats with P5AA, KR2Q IS permitted to ask that a message from KR2Q (or w
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00094.html (8,129 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu